
Define what’s worth doing next.
- Map regional opportunities across key streams
- Assess scale, fit and near-term value
- Prioritize the most promising areas
- Build a shared opportunity inventory
A PROPOSED 90-DAY SCOPING PLAN FROM POSSIBILITY TO PRIORITY
The aim is a decision-ready regional opportunity portfolio: a prioritized shortlist, preliminary business cases, and practical delivery options that leadership can assess before committing resources.
Proposed framework based on the approved V2 roadmap. Timing, participation and resources require agreement.
Three connected outputs, with sources, assumptions and unresolved questions made visible.
HOW THE WORK UNFOLDS
The proposed 90-day schedule has a practical sequence: map widely, test a smaller set of candidates, and clarify the choices needed for a responsible next step.



WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE
The win is not the number of meetings or reports. It's being able to explain which candidates deserve the next investment of time and money—and which do not.
Each shortlisted pathway needs an explicit evidence record, gaps that remain, and an accountable next action. A negative result can still be valuable if it avoids the wrong commitment.
Who controls it, what volume exists, and what makes it usable?
Which applications, specifications, customers and partners make it real?
What are the cost drivers, existing capabilities, constraints and risks?
Whose decision is needed, what evidence remains, and what would it take?
These are proposed decision-quality criteria, not confirmed project findings. Specific acceptance thresholds must be agreed with technical, commercial and public stakeholders.
THE SCREEN BEHIND THE SHORTLIST
Use the same essential questions for each candidate, with different technical standards and buyer requirements. The screen exposes weak assumptions before a delivery decision.
Resources, qualified users and real commercial demand must support a pathway before new infrastructure or long-term agreements make sense.
Clarify where it originates, how much exists, variation, contamination, current use and potential handling constraints.
More than a promising idea
Specifications and performance
Owners, costs, permits and risks
AFTER THE SCOPING WORK · LEADERSHIP DECISION
The scoping team prepares decision dossiers and recommended next actions. Leadership and participating organizations can then authorize a targeted pilot, commission more evidence, defer an opportunity, or discontinue it. A decision to build is not presumed.

A ROADMAP NEEDS REGIONAL EVIDENCE
Input may come from material or water generators, processors, potential users, researchers, public agencies and workforce partners. The purpose is to test opportunities—not solicit unverified endorsements.
Volumes, variability, current handling and practical constraints.
Specifications, existing capacity, price and willingness to test.
Characterization, qualification, safety and operating experience.
Infrastructure, procurement, community priorities and governance.
TURN EVIDENCE INTO THE NEXT MOVE
A strong scoping effort leaves a transparent record: where the opportunity is, what could make it commercially real, where evidence is missing, and who can move it forward.
This is the approved V2 proposed scoping concept, not an announced or funded program. Implementation requires partner agreement and authorization.